Trump on 60 Minutes: Heaven, Net Worth and Blame

Photo: Daniel Torok, The White House / Public domain

60 Minutes is supposed to be the serious interview. The one where a president sits down and answers real questions about real things. Donald Trump sat down with Norah O'Donnell and the interview drifted somewhere else entirely. Heaven. His net worth. And a long list of people to blame for an economy he keeps calling his own when it suits him.

Start with heaven, because that is where the conversation actually went. Trump talked about the afterlife, about whether he would get in, about whether his record would be enough. This is a man who has never shown much interest in humility or repentance, and suddenly he is musing about his eternal destination on national television. There was no moment of reflection about the people his policies hurt. There was just a president wondering aloud about his own reward.

Then there was the net worth talk. Trump has always been obsessed with the size of his fortune, and the interview gave him another stage to inflate it. He has spent decades claiming a number that no one outside his orbit can verify, and he did it again. The exact figure does not matter. What matters is the instinct. Asked about the country, he reaches for his own balance sheet. The economy belongs to the American people, not to him.

And then came the blame. For all the talk about how strong everything is, Trump had no shortage of people to point at. The previous administration. The Federal Reserve. Anyone who disagreed with him this week. The pattern is familiar by now. When the numbers are good, it is all him. When the numbers are bad, it is someone else's fault. A president who has been in office this long should not need a list of scapegoats every time he sits for an interview.

None of this is trivial, even if it sounds like it. The point of a 60 Minutes interview is supposed to be accountability. It is a chance to ask the most powerful person on earth about the decisions that shape millions of lives. Instead we got a tour of one man's preoccupations. His soul. His money. His grievances. The detours tell you where his mind is. The country is asking for leadership. He is giving them a monologue.

Contrast that with what voters said in the midterms. They voted for leaders who talk about housing costs and health care and whether families can get by. They voted against the spectacle. Jeffries called it a blue tsunami, and part of the reason is this. People are tired of a politics that is entirely about one man and his feelings. They want a government that solves problems instead of performing them.

What happens next is that the interview becomes a clip reel. His supporters will call it honest. His critics will call it unserious. Both are right in a way. It was honest in the sense that it showed exactly who he is. And it was unserious in the sense that a president with this much power should have more to offer than his net worth and his worries about heaven. The job is not about him. The sooner he figures that out, the better.

WEAR YOUR VOICE